Radiance Sutra 81
Drop the thought,
“I am this body.”
Abandon the limitation,
“I am only here in this specific place and time.”
Embrace instead,
I
am not my body.
I
am not this place.
I
am not this time.
There
is no place.
There
is no time.
Realize,
I
am everywhere,
Sustained by infinite bliss.
It’s really funny that meditation has such peaceful
connotations, because it is actually one of the most difficult and scariest activities
I have ever attempted. By “meditation,” I’m referring here to the classic
practice of sitting-your-bum-on-a-cushion-and-breathing, which is an entirely
different beast from meditation’s other forms. I regularly, and happily,
practice moving meditations: yoga and walking almost always help to quiet my
inner monologue (which, contrary to my exterior self, really doesn’t know when
to shut the fuck up) in a way that feels natural and easy. Artistic meditation,
too – that I can do. When reading, or writing, or listening to music or baking
a batch of cookies, I’ve always been able to fall into a trance. These are the
only moments in which I am completely unaware of the clock; the only times when
I am finally unaware of my body.
But just sitting, just breathing,
just hoping – or, worse, expecting – that I will stop talking to
myself? That feels impossible. I can’t even fall asleep in less than an hour. I
consider savasana – corpse pose – one of the more challenging poses of my yoga
practice. How could I possibly keep quiet long enough to meditate?
But then I came across this sutra through my beloved yoga studio, which hosted Lorin Roche for a weekend workshop. His book,
The Radiance Sutras, is an updated translation of the Vijnana Bhairava
Tantra, an ancient Sanskrit collection of 112 meditations. The overall text is
framed by an interaction between the god Shiva and his consort Shakti, with each,
alternating deity professing a sutra to the other lover.
I’d had no idea what the Vijnana Bhairava Tantra
was, or who Lorin Roche was, before I read yogapata’s blog. But as I read Lorin’s
version of Sutra 81, I felt overcome by an uncanny sense of familiarity: it was
like I’d already known these words, like they were inside of me, always,
and here they were, gorgeously articulated onto the page.
It all made so much
sense: I am not my body, I am not my stuff, I am not my clothing or my apartment
or my choice of perfume. I am more, and I am less, all at once. But this meditation, using the text’s narrative
frame, arranged my jumbled feelings into more eloquent and universal terms than
my objective standpoint could ever hope to do.
I’ve found myself chanting these
lines throughout my day. Their serene, but rapturous, beauty has replaced the Distillers
and the Descendants running on a loop in my head (I’m going through an old
school pop-punk thing right now), providing a comforting and useful soundtrack
to my daily tasks.
You guys, I swear I'm not a hippie. But, true to its nature as a
mantra, Radiance Sutra 81 has become more to me than a combination of pleasing
words, or a brilliant modern translation of an ancient text: it’s become a
surprisingly easy step towards practicing a kinder and more mindful way of life. And even - lo and behold - a kinder and more approachable form of daily meditation.
(Photo by Danielle Goldstein. Again.)

So this is really interesting to me. Because I (obviously) struggle with meditation/quieting the mind as well. For me, it even took time to master moving meditations; for years, I spent yoga classes obsessing over what time it was and what I was going to eat for dinner. I have finally reached a point where I can truly just be on my mat, and what helps me stay focused is by staying present; reminding myself that my body, my mind, and my soul are presently HERE.
ReplyDeleteThat feels at odds to what's written above:
Abandon the limitation,
“I am only here in this specific place and time.”
Though that may also be conceptually true, I don't quite see how it can help focus the mind to think, "I am everywhere"?
Al, I'm totally with you. I was initially attracted to this meditation on some deep, non-intellectual level - but when I went back and read the lines over in an attempt to analyze them, I was also confused by what that “not being in a specific place and time" actually means. I couldn't really answer that question using words, so I just tackled that confusion with my initial approach: the emotional/visceral. So for me, that line evokes a feeling of freedom and spaciousness: like without the [imaginary] bounds of proscribed time and space, we can move easily and peacefully throughout our day. That freedom of movement (whether physical/temporal/etc) allows us to disregard the nagging voice wondering what to have for dinner; or the anxiety about doing all the things we need to do within the amount of time we feel we have. For me, this meditation is really about dissolving the boundaries of the self (but not in a scary way). It’s about really feeling our innate freedom, and understanding that we all have enough time to do everything we need to do, so we can all just chill the fuck out.
DeleteI think the trick is to figure out what it is that can quiet one's own individual inner rumblings. It might be the Radiance Sutra for some or something entirely different for others. As long as you can find something that helps with inner peace then go with that!
ReplyDeleteThat's definitely true! In his book Lorin Roche advises to "honor the no" when finding your own meditation practice - and that "not all of these practices are for every body." You just have to run with what speaks to you, and accept what doesn't.
Delete